Legal Opinion

Katz v. Cie Generale Transatlantique

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 22, 1960No. 7817PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge.

On motion of both libellant and respondent to retax the costs assessed by the Clerk, and considering initially li-bellant’s motion, the Court finds:

1. The costs of the witness, Berhard Baer, were previously paid by respondent, and hence are not taxable against respondent.

2. The costs of the witness, Lucy Baer, were previously paid by respondent, and hence are not taxable against respondent.

3. The attendance fee for the witness, Sylvia Grossman, is taxable against respondent even though not paid by libel-lant.

*4364. The attendance fee for the witness, Frederick…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vincennes Steel Corporation v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. Barnhart v. JonesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1949
  3. Lorentz Ludvigsen, Libelant-Appellant v. Commercial Stevedoring Co., Inc., and the J. L. Mowinckels RederiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. United States ex rel. Hudson River Stone Supply Co. v. Venable Const. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1904
  5. O'Neil v. Kansas City, S. & M. R. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaiser Industries Corp. v. McLouth Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970
  2. American Steel Works v. Hurley Construction Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
  3. Carlson v. PalmerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1979
  4. Oakley v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API