Legal Opinion
United States v. Article of Drug
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided December 9, 1976No. CIV-2-75-7PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEESE, District Judge.
This is a civil in rem action commenced January 20, 1975 for the condemnation as adulterated of two ingredients and an article of drug into which they were incorporated as “PET-TABS-GEE” while held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce. It is claimed that these articles are “new animal drugs” which are legally unsafe, since no approved application therefor is in effect. The articles were seized on February 5, 1975 pursuant to the warrant of arrest issued from this Court. Beecham, Inc. intervened as claimant of the seized articles. Trial was to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Henkel v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- C. E. Bradshaw, Sr. v. Vic ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- William H. Grogan, James B. Shepeard, Raymond Carner and Ottis Lutz v. United States of America and Tecon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Spiritwood Grain Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wolfe v. WolfeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
- Williams v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Fleet Investment Co. v. RogersDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
- Board of Directors v. Anden GroupDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991