Legal Opinion
Changzhou Wujin Fine Chemical Factory Co. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 2, 2013No. Consol. 09-00216PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Senior Judge:
This case returns to the court following a remand to the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) for further proceedings in accordance with the Federal Circuit’s decision in Changzhou Wujin Fine Chemical Factory Co. v. United States, 701 F.3d 1367 (Fed.Cir.2012) {“Changzhou”). 1 The Federal Circuit instructed Commerce to reconsider its approach in calculating the separate rate assigned to Plaintiff Jiangsu Jianghai Chemical Group, Ltd. (“Jiangsu”). 2 On remand, Commerce changed its approach by abandoning the simple average methodology from the investigation 3…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- Changzhou Wujin Fine Chemical Factory Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Navneet Publ'ns (India) Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015