Department of Natural Resources v. Adams
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
It is inherent in our judicial system that review by an appellate court usually starts, not at the beginning of a case, but at the end, and, going backward from there, may result in the same ending, a new ending, or a new beginning.
One of the many unusual aspects of this duck blind controversy now under review is that we start in the middle and go in both directions. This wide ranging process leads us to conclude that the order appealed from, entered by Judge Daniel T. Prettyman in the Circuit Court for Dorchester County, was correct, and should be affirmed.
The Dispute
The dispute arose over…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amalgamated Casualty Insurance v. HelmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Harden v. Mass Transit AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Comptroller of Treasury v. Mandel, Lee, Goldstein, Burch Re-Election CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Department of Motor Vehicles v. Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Frericks v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Worton Creek Marina, LLC v. ClaggettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Erman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Prince George's County v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Cassidy v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Balt. Police Dept v. BrooksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020