Legal Opinion
Balt. Police Dept v. Brooks
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 30, 2020No. 0979/19Published
1Opinion of the Court
Baltimore Police Department v. James Brooks et al. Case Nos. 979, 980, 982, 983, 985, 988, 989, 991, 992, 993, 994, September Term 2019, Argued, 05/12/2020 Opinion by Harrell, J. HEADNOTE PUBLIC SAFETY – LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS’ BILL OF RIGHTS – FILING ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES For a police department to “file[] the charges” under Md. Code, Pub. Safety § 3-106(a) in an administrative disciplinary action against an officer, it must act with some level of formality. The Baltimore City Police Department’s practice was to require a signature as the final step before charges may be served upon an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marriott Employees Federal Credit Union v. Motor Vehicle AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. the Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Coleman v. Anne Arundel County Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.