Legal Opinion

DeMario v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 24, 1997No. A-6461PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

In this expedited appeal, Dominic A. De-Mario contends that the district court violated his right to protection against double jeopardy by increasing a previously imposed sentence. 1 We find no double jeopardy violation but conclude that DeMario is entitled to a new sentencing hearing.

DeMario originally pled no contest to two counts of fourth-degree assault. District Court Magistrate Lynn Christensen sentenced DeMario to consecutive terms of 270 days with 180 days suspended. The state later moved to revoke DeMario’s probation for failure to comply with the probation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Shagloak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sonnier v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Luepke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
  2. Cragg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998
  3. Medina v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2018
  4. Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  5. Robert Joel Mollica II v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API