Legal Opinion

Cragg v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided May 8, 1998No. A-6528PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the superior court abused its discretion in refusing to strike disputed factual allegations from a pre-sentence report. As explained in more detail below, the State alleged that James A. Cragg had violated his probation by failing to report to his probation officer and by possessing alcohol, drugs, and drug paraphernalia. Cragg admitted his failure to report, but he disputed the other allegations. At the ensuing probation revocation hearing, the superior court concluded that the State had failed to prove the other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nukapigak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Thurlkill v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. DeMario v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1997
  4. Evenson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davison v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Christian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  3. Charles Fenning Akelkok v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2020
  4. Davison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
  5. Reandeau v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API