Legal Opinion

Sonnier v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1971No. 1332PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This case presents a single question: After sentence has been imposed upon a criminal defendant, may the trial court, several hours later, bring the defendant, defense counsel, and prosecutor back to the courtroom and impose a more severe sentence? Appellant claims that this procedure violated his rights under the double jeopardy provisions of both the state and federal constitutions. 1

The facts of this case are not in dispute. On May 21, 1970, appellant pleaded guilty to two counts of an indictment charging him with robbery and with assault with intent to kill.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Pascu v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Shagloak v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Gilbert v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Huff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API