Legal Opinion

Pham v. Wagner Litho MacHinery Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1985No. G000315PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TROTTER, P. J.

Appellant is the administrator of a probate estate involving the assets of a deceased personal injury plaintiff, He contends on appeal the period of time between plaintiff’s death and his substitution as plaintiff in her place is not to be included in calculating the five-year period during which the action must be brought to trial. We agree and reverse.

Hoa Minh Pham’s right hand was crushed between two rollers of a machine she had been operating at work. She filed the underlying personal injury action on January 9, 1978, and the named defendants answered that year.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Corrigan v. Bjork Shiley Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Bank of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Ferk v. County of LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Jacqueline C.California Court of Appeal · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API