Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Two questions are presented on this appeal: (1) Was the cause of action alleged by defendants barred by the three-year statute of limitations? and (2) Does the doctrine of equitable estoppel apply to prevent defendants from asserting the bar of the statute of limitations?
Plaintiffs first contention is that the record is too bare to permit summary judgment.
In reviewing a motion for summary judgment we must look at the record in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. Peterson v. Winn-Dixie, 14 N.C. App. 29, 31, 187 S.E. 2d 487, 488 (1972). We must also…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Little v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Mast v. Sapp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Friedland v. GalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Soderlund v. KuchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- First Investors Corp. v. Citizens Bank, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
- Marshburn v. AssociatEd Indemnity Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Rogerson v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.