Little v. Rose

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant contends that the Court of Appeals erred by holding that the three-year statute of limitations did not bar plaintiff’s action. . .

In this connection, prior to trial defendant moved for ¡judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the action was . barred by the three-year statute of limitations.

The Court of Appeals, relying on rules set forth in Wilson v. Development Co., 276 N.C. 198, 171 S.E. 2d 873, correctly held that plaintiff had “pleaded facts sufficient to establish that the commencement of this action took place within the three-year period as required by…