Legal Opinion

Oberkotter v. Spreckels

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1923No. Civ. No. 4211PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants. The cause is now before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The judgment was one dismissing the action for lack of prosecution, and in contending for a reversal appellant malíes the point that the judgment resulted from an abuse of the discretion reposed by law in the trial judge. The motion to dismiss the appeal is presented on the ground that the evidence upon which the cause was dismissed is not before us, and that, therefore, there is nothing upon which we may base a consideration of the question made by appellant.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waymire v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re Estate of BroomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Espinosa v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Lesure v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oberkotter v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Arena v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Taylor v. De VaughnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Brown v. Union Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API