Legal Opinion
Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1034PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Apprill Walden alleges that her former employer, Defendant Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (“PCO-RI”), violated the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C Code § 2-1401.0, et seq., by discriminating and retaliating against her, creating a hostile work environment, and deliberately making working conditions so intolerable that she was forced to resign. Defendant denies these allegations and moves to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Doe v. George Wash. Univ.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Tyes-Williams v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Golden v. Management & Training CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Owens-Hart v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Inst.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.