In Re Estate of Barclay
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County determining the interests of claimants under a will, and from an order refusing a new trial. G. A. Gibbs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by one J. C. Blaekinton from a decree determining the respective interests of claimants under the will of deceased, given in a proceeding under section 1664 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The deceased died testate January 3, 1895, leaving as her heirs at law five surviving children, H. A. Barclay, F. H. Barclay, D. E. Barclay, S. C. Blackinton (the wife of appellant), and Lenore Gillmore. Said S. C. Blackinton died intestate on January 29, 1896, leaving surviving her husband (appellant) and their minor son, Roswell, aged…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Estate of LaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Smith v. FurnishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Wormall v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- Franck v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- National Bk. of San Mateo v. WhitneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. O'ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Estate of WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- In Re Estate of ClaiborneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.