National Bk. of San Mateo v. Whitney
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.
This suit was to" recover three thousand dollars on an instrument, in form a promissory note, dated July 14, 1915, and signed by the defendant. Defendant denied the execution of the note and the debt, and in a separate defense and by way of cross-complaint alleged facts to which further reference is made in this opinion, and which were claimed to constitute a complete defense to the action.
The judgment was in favor of the defendant. On this appeal by plaintiff numerous contentions are made, for an understanding of which it is necessary to state the facts disiclosed by the evidence.
The Leslie…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- McKenney v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- In Re Estate of BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Flora v. Bimini Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Local Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Latcholia v. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1942
- Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore v. QueenanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Tulsa Industrial Loan & Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Central Bank of Bingham v. StephensUtah Supreme Court · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.