Smith v. Furnish
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The plaintiff, Emma L. Smith, and her co-plaintiff, A. J. Smith, are husband and wife, and as such resided together in the house of the deceased, William Hicks, during which time Mrs. Smith rendered Hicks services as nurse, for the value of which this suit was brought. It is contended on behalf of the appellants that the claim for the services was not properly presented to the executors of the estate of Hicks. It was verified by Mrs. Smith, and presented in her name by her husband to the executors, and by them rejected. They claim that it should have been verified by the husband, and…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Standiford v. CantrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bekins v. DieterleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Chance v. KobstedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- White v. DeeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- In Re Estate of BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.