Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Ladd

California Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1892No. 14800PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the guperior Court of the city and county of gan Francisco distributing an estate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Appeal from a decree of distribution. By his will, which was executed February 24, 1878, the testator gave one half of his estate to his wife, and made the following provisions respecting the other half:—

“ Clause Fourth. The remainder of my property shall remain, as hereinafter provided, in the hands of my executors, and be held or sold, and the proceeds reinvested or loaned by my executors, in their discretion, and the net income thereof, to an amount not exceeding twenty-four hundred dollars in United States gold coin, per annum, payable in quarterly installments, shall be divided equally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Payne v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Colt v. ColtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865
  3. Johns Hopkins University v. PinckneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Estate of DominiciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Estate of McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Crosby v. Alton Ochsner Medical FoundationMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Lightfoot v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API