Legal Opinion
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. LaCasse
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided March 27, 2003No. 02 C 3120PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
The background of this case is explained fully in Central States v. Nitehawk Express, Inc., 223 F.3d 483, 485-87 (7th Cir.2000). Briefly, plaintiff Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (“the Fund”) is a multi-employer pension plan. Plaintiff Howard McDougall is trustee of that fund. In 1992, when the events leading up to the current suit began, defendant James LaCasse was the president of and sole shareholder in two Minnesota corporations, Nitehawk Express, Inc. (“Nitehawk”) and Six Transfer Co. (“Six Transfer”). Due to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Robinson Engineering Company, Ltd. Pension Plan and Trust and R. W. Robinson & Associates Company Profit Sharing Plan v. Mark G. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- College Craft Companies, Ltd. v. PerryDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flynn v. Ohio Building Restoration, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Hill v. Opus Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Armada (Singapore) Pte Ltd. v. Amcol International Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. BergquistDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Muir v. NBTY, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018