Legal Opinion
Flynn v. Ohio Building Restoration, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 2, 2003No. Civil Action 02-0921 (RBW)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss or Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment [# 5]. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion will be denied.
I. Factual Background
Plaintiffs are Trustees of the Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund (“IPF” or “the Fund”). Compl. 11111, 3. 1 The IPF “is an ‘employee benefit plan’ within the meaning of Section 3(3) of [the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”)], 29 U.S.C. § 1002(3), and is a ‘multi-employer plan’ within the meaning of Section…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Erby v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Powers v. DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Flynn v. Tiede-Zoeller, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Flynn v. Veazey Construction Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Intrepid Potash-New Mexico, LLC v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.