Legal Opinion

Ross v. Jaybird Automation, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1988No. Docket 95712PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, P.J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from a circuit court order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs originally brought a product liability action against defendants for their failure to warn or instruct plaintiff Ronnie Lee Ross’s employer regarding the installation of a coil cradle machine. The trial court found that defendants owed no duty to warn or instruct, and granted summary disposition for defendants. We affirm.

On September 27, 1983, plaintiff Ronnie Lee Ross was working at Prestige Stamping, Inc. Ross was injured while operating a production system consisting of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Antcliff v. State Employees Credit UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Huff v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Guaranteed Construction Co. v. Gold Bond ProductsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Pettis v. Nalco Chemical Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MacKowick v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Portelli v. I R Construction Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Glittenberg v. Doughboy Recreational Industries, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Brown v. Drake-Willock International, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Mills v. Curioni, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API