MacKowick v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
The appellant here requests that this Court reverse the decision of the Superior Court, 373 Pa.Super. 434, 541 A.2d 749, which affirmed the judgment entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County. For the following reasons we conclude that as a matter of law appellant failed *54to state a cause of action in strict liability based upon inadequate warning, and the judgment of the Superior Court must be affirmed.
In December, 1982, the appellant, William Mackowick, was installing an electrical capacitor in the switchgear room at Western Pennsylvania Hospital. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Berrier v. Simplicity Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Davis v. Berwind Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.