Legal Opinion

Scott v. Mohr

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1989No. A89A0419PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Judge.

This is a direct appeal by the former wife of the appellee, upon an action for breach of a contract entered into by the parties contemporaneous with the divorce settlement and judgment.

The divorce settlement and agreement entered into and incorporated in the divorce judgment and decree, provided that Mohr would “pay and be responsible for the cost of any psychiatrist or other behavioral scientist the Wife may use for her own care up to, but not exceeding, 24 consecutive months [hereafter] . . . and up to, but not exceeding, a total cost ... in any given month.”

On the same date…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CITICORP INDUSTRIAL CREDIT, INC. v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  2. Department of Human Resources v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Karsman v. PortmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eickhoff v. EickhoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Smith v. SimondsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Eickhoff v. EickhoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  4. Eickhoff v. EickhoffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API