Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eickhoff v. Eickhoff

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 25, 1993No. S93A0932, S93X0933, S93A1017, S93X1018Published

1DissentHunstein, Justice

Although I concur fully in the affirmance of the judgment in Case No. S93X0933, I cannot otherwise concur with the majority’s opinion because I cannot agree with the majority that an agreement in which issues such as child custody, child support, and alimony are settled should be treated as a conventional business contract enforceable by an action on a debt in those instances where the parties failed to have the agreement incorporated into their divorce decree. The majority gives no weight to the subject matter of these agreements — indeed, it dismisses as merely serendipitous the fact that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. LindseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Conley v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  4. Larimer v. LarimerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Carr v. CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API