Legal Opinion
Eickhoff v. Eickhoff
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 25, 1993No. S93A0932, S93X0933, S93A1017, S93X1018Published
1Opinion of the Court
263 Ga. 498 (1993)
435 S.E.2d 914
EICKHOFF
v.
EICKHOFF (four cases).
S93A0932, S93X0933, S93A1017, S93X1018.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Decided October 25, 1993.
Reconsideration Denied November 5, 1993.
Rountree & Souther, George M. Rountree, for appellant.
Carl V. Kirsch, for appellee.
CARLEY, Justice.
In 1986, appellant-plaintiff Ms. Nancy Anne Eickhoff and appellee-defendant Mr. Bruce Frey Eickhoff were divorced in Pennsylvania. During the pendency of their divorce action, they had entered into a settlement agreement. This settlement agreement provided that, upon appellee's retirement, appellant was to…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Haggard v. Board of Regents of University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Travelers Insurance v. BlakeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Z & L LUMBER OF ATLASBURG v. NordquistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Watkins v. ConwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.