Legal Opinion

Welfare Investment Co. v. Stowell

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1933No. Docket No. 8996PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of the payee, sued one of four comakers of a joint and several promissory note. The defendant answered, setting up special defenses of payment through allegations that the purported assignment to the plaintiff herein was made at the instance and request of one of the comakers of said promissory note; that the plaintiff herein is in fact the alter ego of said comaker ; that the obligation of the defendant to the payee upon said promissory note was in fact satisfied and discharged by the plaintiff herein; and that the purported assignment thereof to this plaintiff was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Harris v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Jackson v. LacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Pugh v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API