Legal Opinion

Harris v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1931No. Docket No. 4343PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiffs had judgment against the defendants in the court below, from which judgment the defendants appeal upon the judgment-roll alone.

The record shows that on or about July 1, 1926, the appellants and respondents executed and delivered their promissory note for $900 to the Bank of America, at its office in Grass Valley, California. On or about the seventeenth day of January, 1930, the respondents herein paid to said bank the sum of $939.69, being the balance of principal and -interest then due and unpaid on said note. The bank, upon ■receiving payment, indorsed upon the note the words…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Moore v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Rolls v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Stone v. HammellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Welfare Investment Co. v. StowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Collection Control Bureau v. WeissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Quality Wash Group V, Ltd. v. HallakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Gibbons v. SommersMercer County Court of Common Pleas · 1957
  5. Proctor v. PyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API