Legal Opinion

Ruggiero v. Ruggiero

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 22, 2003No. AC 22426PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HENNESSY, J.

The plaintiff, Murray Ruggiero, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it modified its order of custody and visitation of his minor children. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly ordered him to (1) undergo a psychological evaluation and (2) pay all of the attorney’s fees for the guardian ad litem in connection with the proceedings to determine if the custody and visitation orders should be modified.1

The following facts and procedural history are necessary for our resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. On June 1,1999, the court dissolved the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Turgeon v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Schult v. SchultSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Roach v. RoachConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  4. Savage v. SavageConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  5. Pascal v. PascalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Jose B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  2. Kavanah v. KavanahConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Szymonik v. SzymonikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Lamacchia v. ChilinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API