Legal Opinion

Szymonik v. Szymonik

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 23, 2016No. AC36301PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.

This appeal concerns the court's judgment and orders related to a postjudgment motion for modification of custody filed by the defendant, Peter Szymonik. 1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) ordered him to pay the post-judgment fees of the guardian ad litem without legislative authorization; (2) characterized the fees as being "in the nature of child support," such that there would be no appellate stay and he, thereafter, could be held in contempt and incarcerated if he failed to pay those fees during the appeal process; 2 and (3) issued new postjudgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loisel v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Larobina v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Goldberg v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Nweeia v. NweeiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cockayne v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  2. Szymonik v. SzymonikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  3. Szymonik v. SzymonikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API