Legal Opinion
Reid v. Washington Overhead Door, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 25, 2000No. CIV. A. AW-99-2877PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant U.S.A.’s Motion for Summary Judgment [50-1]. The other defendant, Washington Overhead Door, Inc., recently settled with the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Court will deny-as-moot Defendant Washington Overhead Door Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment [48-1]. The pending motion has been briefed, and no hearing is deemed necessary. See Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant Defendant U.S.A.’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. Background
The background facts of this case are fairly…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ronald K. Drewitt v. Fred L. Pratt Pizza Hut of America, Inc., City of Norfolk, Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Loughlin v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Doe v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Pippin v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001