Legal Opinion
Loughlin v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 19, 2002No. CIV.A. 02-152(ESH)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
The Loughlins have brought suit against the United States (“government”), American University (“American” or “AU”), and Glenbrook Limited Partnership, Lawrence N. Brandt, Inc., Lawrence N. Brandt, and Robert Brandt [hereinafter referred to collectively as “Glenbrook-Brandt”] because of the presence of munitions, highly toxic chemicals, and chemical warfare agents on their residence at 4825 Glenbrook Road. 1 Glenbrook-Brandt has filed cross-claims for negligence against the United States seeking compensation for property damage and indemnification for…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Erby v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Al-Owhali v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Flynn v. Ohio Building Restoration, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- AGROCOMPLECT, AD v. Republic of IraqDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.