Legal Opinion

In re Donnelly

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.

Petitioner, as attorney for the two persons convicted, has unsuccessfully sought to obtain their release by habeas corpus. His application having been denied, he now applies for a stay, pending appeal, and the admission of the prisoners to bail. Their present status is that of persons convicted of grand larceny, whose conviction was finally affirmed by the Court of Appeals. The trial judge subsequent to affirmance suspended the execution of their sentence indefinitely and without condition, and thereafter revoked the suspension. The writ was sought on the ground of lack of power to revoke…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re DonnellyNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  2. People ex rel. Meeker v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. People ex rel. Le Carta v. WardenNew York Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Fyfe v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People ex rel. Goldberg v. Sheriff, New York County Courts1954
  3. People ex rel. Levy v. NennaNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People ex rel. Walker v. DennoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API