Legal Opinion
In re Donnelly
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
This matter arises upon a petition for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of Clark G. Kuney and Edward A. Sauter (hereinafter referred to as defendants) to inquire into the causes of their detention. The petitioner is one of their attorneys. The defendants were convicted of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, and on May 1, 1936, sentenced to State prison for a period of years. They obtained a certificate of reasonable doubt. The judgment of conviction was affirmed February 5, 1937, by the Appellate Division (People v. Commonwealth Bond Corp., 250 App. Div. 701) and on January 4,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. MinayaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Curtis v. BennettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- People v. KastelNew York County Court, Montgomery County · 1939
- In re DonnellyNew York Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.