Taylor Realty Co. v. Haberling
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Taylor Realty Company, appeals from a judgment and from a subsequent order denying its motion for a new trial on the issue of damages. We affirm.
*871This action arises out of a lease of real property owned by plaintiff. The property in question consists of a gasoline station located just outside the city limits of Sioux Falls, South Dakota. On February 26, 1976, plaintiff leased the gas station to defendant for a term of five years beginning March 1, 1976. The lease provided, among other things, that both plaintiff and defendant had the right to terminate the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Platt v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by18 opinions
- Veith v. O'BRIENSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Beyer v. CordellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Karst v. Shur-Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. RondellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Goff v. GoffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.