Legal Opinion

Veith v. O'BRIEN

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2007No. 24012, 24025PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] On December 31, 2003, Darrel Veith (Veith) filed a complaint against Peter O’Brien, M.D. (Dr. O’Brien) and Sioux Valley Clinic Corporation d/b/a Surgical Associates (Sioux Valley Clinic) with the South Dakota Second Judicial Circuit. Veith’s complaint alleged claims of medical negligence and respondeat superior. On September 28, 2004, Veith amended his complaint, adding a claim for failure to obtain informed consent. A jury trial was held from November 29, 2005 through December 6, 2005. The jury delivered a verdict in favor of Dr. O’Brien and Sioux Valley…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. State v. PellegrinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Cunningham v. Yankton Clinic, P. A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Johnson v. John Deere Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Shamburger v. BehrensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Kostel v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. BuchholtzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Karst v. Shur-Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API