Legal Opinion

State v. Rondell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2010No. 25498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Nicholas Rondell appeals an adverse ruling on a suppression motion. Rondell was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol. Rondell claimed that the traffic stop was an unconstitutional search and seizure and moved to suppress evidence resulting from the stop. After the trial court denied Ron-dell’s motion, he entered into a plea agreement with the State. The State and Ron-dell agreed that Rondell would enter a “conditional guilty plea” to preserve his right to appeal the court’s adverse suppression motion ruling. The trial court accepted the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Veith v. O'BRIENSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. KeohaneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  5. State v. Waubun Nuwi Nini ( 11671)South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GomezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  2. Dirk Sparks v. Matthew ShaverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. State v. BoltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API