State v. Rondell
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Nicholas Rondell appeals an adverse ruling on a suppression motion. Rondell was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol. Rondell claimed that the traffic stop was an unconstitutional search and seizure and moved to suppress evidence resulting from the stop. After the trial court denied Ron-dell’s motion, he entered into a plea agreement with the State. The State and Ron-dell agreed that Rondell would enter a “conditional guilty plea” to preserve his right to appeal the court’s adverse suppression motion ruling. The trial court accepted the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Veith v. O'BRIENSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. KeohaneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- State v. Waubun Nuwi Nini ( 11671)South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GomezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Dirk Sparks v. Matthew ShaverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- State v. BoltonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017