Legal Opinion

Platt v. City of Rapid City

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1940No. File No. 8204PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This is an action by which plaintiff, Maud M. Platt, seeks to recover damages for the diversion and loss of water with which to irrigate her lands. Plaintiff owns a farm lying west of Rapid City along the course of Lime or Limestone Creek. A portion of this land had been under irrigation from Lime Creek, as shown by the evidence, from 1882 to about 1930. It appears from the evidence that in 1930 the City of Rapid City purchased the Merrill Springs and diverted the water therefrom to the city mains by constructing a collecting line to intercept the flow of smaller springs feeding the stream.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Hough v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Sturr v. BeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Calhoun Gold Mining Co. v. Ajax Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1899

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bristor v. CheathamArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Miller v. HernandezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fales v. KauppSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Taylor Realty Co. v. HaberlingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Zahrowski v. DahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API