Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Berkowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Decision affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Sweeney and Kane, JJ., concur; Greenblott, J., dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum. Greenblott, J. (dissenting). Claimant was told on September 9, 1971 that he would be discharged effective September 24. He chose to leave on September 10. On these undisputed facts, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board has determined that claimant’s leaving of employment was without good cause. I disagree. This case should not properly be governed by the well-settled rule applicable where an employee leaves his…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brotherton v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. Johnston v. Florida Dept. of CommerceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Eason v. Gould, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. South Dakota Stockgrowers Ass'n v. HollowaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Carlson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API