Legal Opinion
South Dakota Stockgrowers Ass'n v. Holloway
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 12, 1989No. 16363PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
The South Dakota Stockgrowers Association (Stockgrowers) appeals an award of unemployment insurance benefits to Daniel Holloway (Holloway) and the charging of such benefits to its experience rating account. We affirm.
FACTS
Stockgrowers operates under a contract with the South Dakota Brand Board to carry out the board’s brand inspection program. Holloway was employed as Stock-growers’ chief brand inspector. In April 1987 the brand board advised Stockgrowers that it would not renew its contract if Holloway remained the chief brand inspector. Stockgrowers relayed the brand board’s position to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Ferguson v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Philadelphia Parent Child Center, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Kienast v. Sioux Valley Co-OpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Poteat v. Employment Security Comm.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Egemo v. FloresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re the Appeal of Hendrickson's Health Care ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. PolinskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Holloway v. CongerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Phipps Bros. Inc. v. Nelson's Oil & Gas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.