In Re Senate Bill 177
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Per curiam
This is a challenge to the reapportionment of the State Senate by the General Assembly. Under the provisions of Chapter II, § 18, of the Vermont Constitution such a reapportionment is mandatory after the taking of each census. In 1965, 17 V.S.A. §§ 1901-11 were enacted to provide the machinery for carrying out this obligation.
Briefly outlined, the procedure first calls for proceedings before a legislative apportionment board, looking to the presentation of a plan of reapportionment to the legislative body. Under the law this plan is to be treated as a bill and passed upon by both houses of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swann v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kilgarlin v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Parsons v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Buckley v. HoffDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1964
- Mikell v. RousseauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lockert v. CrowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
- Veilleux v. SpringerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- In Re Reapportionment of Town of HartlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Aronstam v. CashmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- Brooks v. HobbieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.