Legal Opinion
Veilleux v. Springer
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided January 5, 1973No. 2-72PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaley, J.
The plaintiff, Donald Joseph Veilleux, has brought to this Court a petition for extraordinary relief under the provisions of Rule 21, Vermont Rules of Appellate Procedure, challenging the Vermont implied consent law found in 23 V.S.A. §§ 1201-1205, and specifically § 1205. The relief requested is the vacation of an order made by the Honorable *35Lewis E. Springer, presiding Judge of the Vermont District Court, Unit No. 4, Orleans Circuit, Newport, Vermont, requiring that the plaintiff surrender his operator’s license to the court.
The factual situation culminating in the bringing of the petition…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. FramptonWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Brigham v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Andrews v. LathropSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- Commonwealth v. RutanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.