Legal Opinion

Aronstam v. Cashman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 19, 1974No. 154-74 and 155-74PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Two assistant judges, both over seventy years of age, have initiated actions for extraordinary relief with this Court pursuant to V.R.A.P. 21. They are joined by several of their constituents who state that they will vote for the plaintiff assistant judges if they are candidates for reelection. Their complaints allege that the defendant county clerks of the plaintiffs’ respective counties have refused to accept the plaintiff assistant judges’ petitions to be candidates for reelection to the office of assistant judge. Injunctive relief is sought against'both defendant county clerks to direct…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Chisholm v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1793
  4. Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Leonard v. WillcoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Malmed v. ThornburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  2. Rittenband v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. O'NEIL v. BaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Landers v. StoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. In Re State Aid Highway No. 1, PeruSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API