State v. Maillard
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOFFMAN, Judge.
The State of Indiana appeals a trial court determination that “ ‘Pot 0 Silver’ machines owned by Plaintiff are not gambling devices as defined by Indiana Code § 35-45-5-1.” The facts relevant to review are recited below.
In April 1996, Maillard’s late wife, Jill, instituted proceedings for a declaratory judgment as to whether “quarter slide” or “quarter pusher” machines she owned constituted gambling devices pursuant to Indiana’s criminal code. Jill placed the machines in convenience stores within LaGrange County. Sometime prior to April, the Prosecuting Attorney for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- TINDER, PROS. ATTY. v. Music Op. Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Ashlin Transportation Services, Inc. v. Indiana Unemployment Insurance BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Sullivan v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Albright v. PyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Lashbrook v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- F.A.C.E. Trading, Inc. v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. RumpleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- MISSISSIPPI GAMING COM'N v. HensonMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Mississippi Gaming Commission v. Susan HensonMississippi Supreme Court · 1999