Legal Opinion

State v. Rumple

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2000No. 02A05-9906-CR-262PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge

The State charged Sabrina A. Rumple with operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The evidence against Rumple included the results of a breath test measuring blood-alcohol content (BAC), which was administered on a BAC DataMaster machine. Prior to trial, Rumple submitted a motion to suppress the results of the BAC Data-Master test: The trial court granted the motion and the State now appeals that ruling. The specific issue before this court may be stated as follows:

Did the trial court err in concluding that, pursuant to applicable Indiana statutory and regulatory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. WroblewskiIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mullins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HensleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. MaillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Hannis v. DeuthIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Wray v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Edward Wolpert v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. In Re Crisis Connection, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API