Legal Opinion
F.A.C.E. Trading, Inc. v. Carter
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 2005No. 02A04-0406-CV-337PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF CASE
Appellant-Plaintiff, FACE. Trading Inc., d/b/a Face Card Promotions, a Wisconsin Corporation (FACE), appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees-Defendants, the Indiana Attorney General (Attorney General); the Prosecutor of the Alcohol & Tobacco Commission; the Commissioner of the Alcohol & Tobacco Commission; and, the Director of the Hoosier Lottery (Hoosier Lottery), (collectively, the Appellees), concluding that Ad-Tabs are an illegal gambling device pursuant to Indiana Code § 35-45-5-1.
We affirm.
ISSUES
FACE raises two issues on appeal,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Posadas De Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co. of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Communications Commission v. American Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Corbin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Blocher v. DeBartolo Properties Management, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Lytle v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Face Trading, Inc. v. Department of Consumer & Industry ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Smith v. YangIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- F.A.C.E. Trading, Inc. v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Sniezek v. Colorado Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lindey v. Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control EnforcementCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.