United Glass Workers' Local No. 188 v. Seitz
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, C. J.
This action was brought to recover a fine which had been imposed upon the defendant Earl J. Seitz by the plaintiff union for violation of his agreement, as a union member, not to work behind an authorized picket line. The defendants moved to strike the complaint, contending that the court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the complaint did not state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
The trial court treated the motion as a motion for summary judgment. It determined that the court had jurisdiction of the action but dismissed the same on the ground that the constitution…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Management, Inc. v. SchassbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Ericksen v. Edmonds School District No. 15Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Goss v. Northern Pacific Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Cox v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Minch v. Local Union No. 370Washington Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by24 opinions
- City of Seattle v. Dyad Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Thomas D. Klemens, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Air Line Pilots Association, International, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Paradise Orchards General Partnership v. FearingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- S. L. Rowland Construction Co. v. Beall PipeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Mid-America Marketing Corp. v. Dakota Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.