Legal Opinion

S. L. Rowland Construction Co. v. Beall Pipe

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 15, 1975No. 2363-1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andersen, J.—

Facts Of Case

The City of Everett, finding itself with a badly deteriorated 22-mile long wooden pipeline leading from its water source at Lake Chaplain, called for bids on the construction of a new steel pipeline.

S. L. Rowland Construction Company (Rowland) was the low bidder of 13 bidders on a liy2-mile-long segment of the new line. This was the portion of the pipeline running underground from Woods Creek, north of Monroe, to Jones Hill, north of Snohomish. Rowland contracted with the City of Everett (the City) to construct a 51-inch steel pipeline along this route for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Brotherhood of FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. F. H. McGraw & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  3. Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
  5. V. C. Edwards Contracting Co. v. Port of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. LK Operating, LLC v. Collection Group, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Carrothers Construction Co. v. City of South HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. City of Seattle v. Dyad Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API