Legal Opinion

Balcer Bros. Motor Coach Co. v. Niemann

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 4, Calendar No. 36,280PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff bought of defendants for $62,500—

“the following goods and chattels, to-wit, 15 motor busses, identified as numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19 and the Acme bus and the A. C. P. chassis, together with the titles thereto and insurance policies thereon, which motor busses have been used by said party of the first part in operating their motor bus line in the city of Bay City, together with such lines, licenses and permits, and also all parts, accessories, tires, batteries and all other pieces of material belonging to said parties of the first part and used by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. White Automobile Co. v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  2. McGowan v. American Pressed Tan Bark Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Rittenhouse, Winterson Auto. Co. v. KissnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916
  4. Dwyer v. RedmondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Mobile Auto Co. v. SturgesMississippi Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howard-Cooper Corp. v. Umpqua Dredging & Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API