Legal Opinion

Sokolsky v. Eidelman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 2014PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY MUNDY, J.:

Appellant, Janice L. Sokolsky (“Sokol-sky”), appeals from the September 18, 2013 order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Edward R. Eidelman, Esquire and Eidelman Crossley, LLC (collectively “the Attorneys”), and dismissing her cause of action. After careful review, we reverse in part, vacate in part, and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The trial court summarized the relevant factual and procedural history of this case as follows.

[Sokolsky]’s ease sounds in legal malpractice, in which she claims that the attorney defendants negligently…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. LuddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Thompson v. Nason HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Powell, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Ponzini v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Rodriguez, M. v. Kravco Simon Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Estate of Denmark Ex Rel. Hurst v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Seels v. Tenet Health System Hahnemann, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API