Legal Opinion

Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. Luddy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 2005No. 88 WAP 2001PublishedCited by 273 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice CASTILLE.

This is an appeal from a Superior Court decision affirming in part and reversing in part the order of the trial court which, in pertinent part here, refused to set aside a jury award of punitive damages for a claim arising out of negligent supervision. The Superior Court held, as a matter of law, that punitive damages are unavailable on a claim sounding in negligent supervision under Section 317 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts. We disagree with the Superior Court’s conclusion that punitive damages are never available for claims of negligent supervision.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Chambers v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Kirkbride v. Lisbon Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by273 opinions

  1. Jane Doe, and Jane Roe and Jane Roe 2, Proposed-Intervenors-Appellants v. Oberweis DairyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Phillips v. Cricket LightersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Doe v. LiberatoreDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Empire Trucking Co. v. Reading Anthracite Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

268 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API