Johnson v. Onsted
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Lenawee. (Watts, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts ■ are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.
In this case Ida B. Onsted was divorced from her husband, the defendant, on February 13, 1874, and by the decree she obtained was given the ■care, management, and maintenance of their child, a little girl then about three years old. Ida married the plaintiff in September, 1874 ,who immediately took her and the ■child to his home, and has cared for the child as he would his own ever since, with a full knowledge of the provisions of the decree between his wife and the defendant. It does not appear that in her suit for divorce .Mrs. Onsted either asked for or obtained any order for •cither…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Husband v. HusbandIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ramsey v. RamseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- McKay v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Laumeier v. LaumeierSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- People v. DunstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Hyde v. LeisenringMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.